• soulfirethewolf@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    If this weren’t for a gimmicky publicity stunt, I’d say it would be more cost effective to just give out DLSR cameras to adoption centers.

    • Nath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes and no. DSLRs can be cheaper, but there’s something to be said about the simplicity of taking a photo and sending it immediately to a prospective family, or if your site is set up nicely, uploading it straight to a website in moments.

      You can get superior photos shooting with a DSLR, but then you’ll want to put the camera somewhere safe, extract the SD card, touch it up with Photoshop/Lightroom and then save the raw as jpg. Then you can send it/upload it.

      Meanwhile with the phone, you’ve taken half a dozen photos and multiple chats going on the device.

    • randombullet@feddit.de
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d say it’s more effective to snap a photo and upload it right away to social media than it is to take a photo, download it on an app, then upload it to social media.

      Unless the shelter has a dedicated social media team, DSLRs or mirrorless would be overkill for the average person.