• YaBoyMax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It appears to be a rule against posting food made from animal products. As someone who doesn’t eat animal products myself, I don’t particularly enjoy scrolling Reddit or Lemmy and seeing a picture of a meat dish, but it doesn’t ruin my day I would never dream of demanding a content warning for it.

      To my knowledge CWs are geared towards content that has the potential to trigger past trauma, and I can’t understand how a food category could be so broadly traumatic to someone (outside of EDs I guess, which is obviously not the focus of this rule).

      • SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        Unfortunately trigger warnings got watered down very quickly, to now also being used as an “anything someone might find the slightest discomfort in”

      • threeduck@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I suspect it’s less of a trigger warning, and more of a means to reframe perceptions of food.

        Like, if TV commercials just started putting little “viewers may find the following depictions of dead animals disturbing” stingers before a commercial of a family eating steaks, it might change perceptions over time.