• Qazwsxedcrfv000@lemmy.unknownsys.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree with you on that. That’s why I find this anti-Meta pact or manifesto or whatever naive and premature.

    Just if there are people who insist on banning anything Meta, they are welcome to do so in their instances. Interoperability is still preserved. They are not adding anything to the protocol. Banning instances is part of the interoperability. I think this is where our opinion differs.

    • drkt@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Just if there are people who insist on banning anything Meta, they are welcome to do so in their instances.

      Isn’t that what we’re doing? We can’t stop Meta from federating, that’s not a function of the protocols. We’re building a pact to defederate them from our instances.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of people came to Mastodon because it was a safe space for queer and marginalized communities after being driven away by the lack of moderation and ability to keep them safe on places like Facebook and Twitter.

      There’s good reason to be suspicious.