• Blue and Orange@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Disruptive protest, no matter how annoying, is valid and should be protected under law. When the government moves to ban protest and dissent, they’ve crossed the line into authoritarianism.

    The right to protest is a fundamental of democracy, and we should not accept any erosion of the fundamentals of democracy.

      • littleblue✨@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        No. “Valid” is not the word.

        “Legal” to a point, and then abruptly lethal to those who escalated it to violence and crimes against the nation. (Yes, that means that, by the book, Trump should already have swung for this alone.)

    • JammaJammaPJ@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      *Peaceful protest yes. Protest that doesn’t violate the rights of the people who live and work in the area.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        They stated disruptive. If no one elses rights are violated it is not disruptive. At minimum disruptive to me would have to include intentionally blocking roadways and holding up everyone else. (Which does violate the rights of people who live and work in the area). So your stance sounds as if to be opposite of the person you commented on.