To be clear, some really great community members have these names, but they’re everywhere now. And with the right characters you can create some really annoying overlaps: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3790

Enough of them floating around now that I’ll probably do a PR for my favorite client to filter them out.

      • Kogasa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re missing the point. There are people who want to solve this problem (certain problematic display names abusing nonstandard unicode) without ruining display names entirely as a feature. I don’t care if you want to see display names or not.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sucks to be them. I didn’t agree to see their vanity names that they can change on a whim.

      • Kogasa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        6 months ago

        I do not give a fuck if you want to see display names or not. I am all for giving you the ability to disable them. Most people like display names, and we already have display names, so I think it makes a lot more sense to offer a solution to the problem created by a small minority of abusive users that isn’t just “disable display names.”

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          Why the agressivity? We’re just voicing our opinions here and GP only asked for the option to do it. Please let’s not make this a new re**it.

      • Kogasa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        Allowing people to better control how they’re identified. Not to write Zalgo spam on people’s screens.

        • seathru@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          Fair enough, but I second the opinion it should be a base lemmy option to opt-in/out. Let those who want to see display names see them; and those who don’t just see the static username.

          • Kogasa@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes. Fine. I’m just saying “option to disable the feature” is not an ideal solution when people are abusing a feature. That doesn’t mean I think you shouldn’t be able to disable it.