I know that Lemmy is open source and it can only get better from here on out, but I do wonder if any experts can weigh in whether the foundation is well written? Or are we building on top of 4 years worth of tech debt?

  • tarjeezy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    From some comments I’ve read, it’s at least in better shape than kbin? A few people expressed interest in helping with that project and then went running for the hills after reading through the code.

      • platypus_plumba@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mother. Of. God. Did they really write Kbin in PHP?

        I may be talking shit because I’m not a PHP coder, but the times I’ve seen it, it was a nightmare.

        • DrWorm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which… makes sense. The creator of doesn’t like coding.

          I actually hate programming, but I love solving problems. I really don’t like programming. I built this tool to program less so that I could just reuse code. PHP is about as exciting as your toothbrush.

          So PHP it born out of a dislike of coding. In turn the documentation is all over the place and inconsistent.

          • ritswd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It has become really solid over time.

            But it will always be a mono-threaded and interpreted technology, and therefore never a good choice for a high-scale solution like a Fediverse application.