• Sprawlie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is ridiculous amount to tip. Good on you for being frivolous and not caring how much you spend, but understand that by your further escalation of tipping you are directly contributing to the businesses that are getting away with it.

    Not 10 years ago, expected tipping was 10-15%. Now you’re throwing 25-30? Or 50? you realize how unstable, unrealistic and how bad a precedent that is setting?

    • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s not a ridiculous amount to tip, but explaining why it’s reasonable requires an understanding of what commodity fetishism is. Are you already familiar with the term? If not, would you be willing to read a description of what it is if I typed one up for you?

      • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        No fucking way someone with an understanding of Marxist sociology supports tipping. Not a fucking chance. I’m so confused right now.

        • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Socialist theory is great, but material conditions don’t care about our ideologies :) I use Marxism and socialism to help myself understand why I feel so alienated and to help fight those feelings, but I still understand that every worker in America lives as an exploited laborer under capitalism. I’m not wealthy or politically powerful or willing to use violence to enforce my views, so my praxis must be aimed at helping the little people until we have enough of a leftist coalition to take on the bigger issues.

          Essentially, I’m not big enough to change the world for the better all on my own, but I can change the parts of it that I can reach out and touch with my hands, so why shouldn’t I?

            • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              spujb@lemmy.cafe typed up the perfect response to this in another thread, let me copypasta their comment for you:

              you are proposing that if we all stop tipping, companies will be motivated to pay their workers; you are correct, this is what would happen if we all stopped tipping at the same time.

              this process is known as collective action. it is incredibly important to remember that collective action only works when it actually happens. in other words, your individual action of not tipping your waiter is ONLY beneficial to your waiter if you can make sure one else tips either.

              do you have this power? (i think you don’t; if you do i beg of you to exercise it lol.)

              now consider who actually holds the power here. at any point, your restaurant’s owner could institute a no-tip policy, thereby ensuring that no one has to tip, ever. several restaurants already have done this, and it works. now, you might (correctly) note that this may gives an unfair advantage to other competing restaurants who do not implement no-tip policy. this is where local and regional policy can come in to help coordinate transitioning to a more helpful model of compensating employees.

              so there’s kind of this imbalance, where yeah technically it’s possible for us as eaters of food to “fix” the tipping problem, but its way way easier for the people in charge (whether that’s government or owners) to fix it, because they have the power of coordination on their side.

              tldr, tip your waiters and advocate for anti-tipping policies if you want to maximize long term benefits for everyone.

              • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Yeah, guess people shouldn’t vote in elections either since their vote doesn’t single handedly settle the election. What an absurdly stupid position to hide behind.

                Relying on restaurant owners to ‘do the right thing’ without any incentive to do so is extremely naive. And they just, don’t. Look around. They could but they don’t.

                • betheydocrime@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  this is where local and regional policy can come in to help coordinate transitioning to a more helpful model of compensating employees.

                  The answer to your criticism is in the very next sentence of the paragraph that you object to.

                  • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I said owners, but should have been more clear and stated both owners and politicians are not taking action. I don’t expect them to anytime soon without incentives.