• Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    You are underestimating, by a mile, the editorial effort that goes into fighting scam and spam, vandalism and lies. Wikipedia does have a support structure to do that, I doubt instance admins have the same kind of resources.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also, any such wiki has to be allow-list only by default. Any open wiki is vandalized with spam and hate speech almost immediately. Open federation would make this trivial.

      • FalseMyrmidon@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        That page starts by complaining that alternative medicine is represented negatively. Going to skip the rest of the blog lol

      • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Of course no single site is perfect. Editors may always have ulterior motives. That is what the editing history is for. But with a federated wiki, the only thing you’ll get is multiple different versions that all present their oen little “truths” and at that point you can just go back and search the entire internet for blogs, just like the website you sent me is a blog.

        • nutomic@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think thats better than having our single “truth” controlled by a corrupt organization from a different country, different language and different culture. With federation there can be independent wikis for my local country or city.