• loops@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hans credits his improved social and communication skills learned in prison among other details shared in the public letters.

    I thought prisons were meant to cause more trauma and help ensure people never leave so as to increase profits?

    • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      Some prisons might be better than others, some people might be able to withstand the system within and work on themselves.

    • wiki_me@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      He is locked in California, a fairly progressive and leftist state i think , I am not entirely certain all that therapy is a good thing, i think i watched a documentary saying that psychopaths only learn from therapy how to be better manipulators and i feel like he sounds like psychopath even now.

      With that said if he gets out of prison i think he should be allowed to participate in FOSS (when someone reviews his contributions), i can’t help but wonder if his reportedly unhinged behavior on the kernel mailing list was handled better (e.g. mandating he will go to therapy) the murder would not have happened.

      • The Doctor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        The prisons he was in previously definitely are not the touchy-feely kind. These days he’s in California Health Care Facility, which is geared toward prisoners with significant mental health problems (notably, multiple serial killers). So, therapy of some kind definitely makes sense. However, Reiser’s been denied parole each and every time he’s been up for it (next review in 2025), so it is unlikely that he’s getting out.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I feel like it is impossible to know enough details to make any kind of conclusions. I do not think foss should check criminal records though.

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        i feel like he sounds like psychopath even now.

        I think it’s rash to judge the tone of his writing like that. It can be a struggle to identify and admit one’s flaws, and it’s certainly a struggle for most people of the modern era to write elegantly with only pen and a few sheets of paper.

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yes, most people experience prison in the way you described. There’s always exceptions, and like someone else said it’s in California. Not a left wing state but the closest you’ll get in the US.

      If the system was so great at rehabilitation the reoffender rate wouldn’t be so insane.

  • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    1 month ago

    Man what a wild ride ReiserFS has been. I remember when it was the mainline FS in a lot of Linux distros. Good on Hans to right some wrongs. Prison has done some good on him

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    While ReiserFS is obsolete and will eventually be dropped from the upstream Linux kernel in Linux 6.10 is one last ReiserFS change that was requested by former lead developer Hans Reiser.

    ReiserFS lead developer and convicted murderer Hans Reiser a few months back wrote letters to be made public apologizing for his social mistakes and other commentary.

    In his written communications he also made a last request for ReiserFS in the Linux kernel: "Assuming that the decision is to remove [ReiserFS] V3 from the kernel, I have just one request: that for one last release the README be edited to add Mikhail Gilula, Konstantin Shvachko, and Anatoly Pinchuk to the credits, and to delete anything in there I might have said about why they were not credited.

    Hans credits his improved social and communication skills learned in prison among other details shared in the public letters.

    Per the indirect request by Hans Reiser, SUSE’s Jan Kara has now altered the ReiserFS README file with the changes going in today to the Linux 6.10 kernel.

    The change landed today as part of the linux-fs merge to Linux 6.10.


    The original article contains 203 words, the summary contains 187 words. Saved 8%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s actually surprisingly wholesome. It’s always wonderful to see people really putting in the effort towards personal growth. It’s good for them, and it’s also good for everyone else.

  • MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    The guy had a friend who admitted to 8 murders and he himself murdered his wife who was the translator for a Russian mail order bride catalogue… Woah. Its hard to believe a person like that could contribute to open source.

    • Vikthor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      You are discussing on a platform created by a man who praises people like Lenin & Castro. Richard Stallman resigned over some comments on Epstein victims. Free software is like that sometimes.

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      A person like what? There’s no connecting thread between morality, emotional maturity, and programming skills.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Who is going to stop them. It’s not like there’s a gatekeeper.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    whats the recommended method of dealing with old reiser partitions once kernel support gets removed?

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Migrate them to a modern filesystem, presumably. ext4 is extremely reliable, btrfs is less proven but much more featureful with copy-on-write and snapshots.

      This isn’t any type of surprise, ResierFS was marked obsolete some time ago now.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        i guess i’m asking how do i migrate them to newer filesystems once kernel support is removed. surely i’ll still be able to modprobe it back in…

        • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Use a kernel version that still has support to perform the copy before upgrading? If already upgraded, boot to the old kernel? Boot from a live iso that has support?

          I mean, this isn’t exactly a hard problem to solve…

    • Klara@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Use an old kernel version (if yours doesn’t still support it) and something like btrfs-convert to get a maintained filesystem instead. Works pretty well in my experience with converting other filesystems to btrfs.

      • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ty!

        I think I’m just gonna burn a Slackware cd and put it in the drawer with all the reiser disks.

        • Klara@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I agree with the other commenter recommending to migrate as soon as possible while the kernel still does support, but that does seem like a workable strategy if you can’t for the foreseeable future.

  • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    How petty - I’m surprised the kernel team allowed that crap in the first place. This should have been changed the day that murderer was convicted.

    • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      No need to change something if there’s no reason to. A murderer of wife he may be, but that wouldn’t change what happened in the project. It’s also possible that since it wasn’t all that popular outside of memes nobody even checked.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        It’s a readme. You don’t need a huge reason to remove bs like this. Using documentation in the kernel source tree to air grievances shouldn’t be allowed.

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          The primary job of the kernel maintainer is to be a technical gatekeeper, not a social one.

          It is fine to have standards for submission, including asking things like READMEs to be free of politics. They could have rejected the original commit for that reason. Even these kinds of policies are difficult to apply uniformly and fairly.

          That said, the original text was a bit mean spirited but pretty harmless, especially for people unfamiliar with the internal project drama. It looks a lot worse through the lens of knowing that he is a murderer.

          What I asking is that it not become anybody’s job to retroactively edit the kernel history for social reasons. Why would this README need to be modified or removed after being accepted?

          Who makes the decision for what gets changed and to what? For what reason? Should the project have changed the name of the filesystem once it was clear it was named after a murderer? Are we all complicit in that crime for having this code on our computers?

          My point is exactly that the kernel is not a library.

          Removing ReiserFS because of its lack of maintenance and future relevance is good kernel maintenance. Rewriting the README like it is a Wikipedia article is not.

          • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            Why would this README need to be modified or removed after being accepted?

            It literally just was and for the same reasons I’m saying it should have been.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            They removed it because it wasn’t being maintained and because there are plenty of other actively developed options.

            They didn’t remove it because of any political reason or because he committed murder.

    • TechNom (nobody)@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      The kernel isn’t a place to play politics. You can’t just yank a component out like that on short notice, even if it has such a horrible story attached to it.

      Back then, ReiserFS was mildly popular and its use would have been widespread (that includes me). The users of ReiserFS and probably even the other kernel devs had no idea that Hans Reiser was capable of such a crime. Infact, he was known as a computer prodigy back then.

      There are plenty of users who don’t have the luxury of migrating data on a short notice to a different filesystem. Disabling the filesystem would have left them high and dry. That’s why the devs gave it a long deprecation period.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The kernel isn’t a place to play politics. You can’t just yank a component out like that on short notice, even if it has such a horrible story attached to it.

        I didn’t say to rip out the kernel module - just to reject or fix the README to be more appropriate. As you say - it’s not a place to play politics and the original README did.

        I’m saying what they just did should have been done a long time ago for the same reasons they did it now. It’s not appropriate to air such crap in the source tree.