• 1 Post
  • 140 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle






  • Why I think this is dystopian: the rich are spending their money to fly their pets on private jets instead of, I don’t know

    the rich are already spending their money on flying their pets private; this article is about scheduled service, which is exact opposite of private flying.

    putting your dog into cargo space of an airplane is a lottery that may not end well: there have been stories where the dog was left on tarmac in extreme temperatures and died from overheating, even when its owner paid some premium package that promised to handle the dog with extra care, for example.

    so while we should definitely think twice if we need to use the airplane for a week long vacation we will spend drinking margaritas by the hotel pool, if i were offered a job across the ocean, being able to get my dog with me and being sure she survives the trip would be a deal-breaker for me.

    what is notable here is it seems to me that at this point it is project that exists in a dream of some marketing expert who knows more about hipster bulls…t than dogs, so we will have to wait if the service actually lifts off the ground to see how it looks in reality.

    from the article:

    Before boarding, dogs will be treated to calming pheromones, music and colors they like best.

    right, dog’s favorite color… 😂






  • Why are you asking me?

    because you are the one who started it. people usually contribute information into public discussion with hope it will be useful to other readers.

    I’m not the one accusing others of “nOt rEaDiNg dA tHrEaD bEfOrE u AsKeD a qUeStOn”.

    no, you are the one AsKIng rHETOrIcal qUEsTioN 🤣

    No one has actually provided an on-topic reply to it yet.

    you were pointed to the fact that your questions were already answered and you can easily read these answers. that is as on topic as it can get.

    you chose weird hill to die on.









  • For purposes of this conversation you can use citizens, civilians, and children interchangeably

    no, you cannot, read the conversation again.

    most people have closer relationship to their own kids than to some other random co-citizen. so if some clown claims, for a sake of his argument, that he would be willing to sacrifice his own kids to protect… literally anyone else, you know he is a moron, or a liar. or both.

    All are examples of collateral damage, and many of Hamas’ human shields will fit into multiple categories.

    sure, but that was not the point of my remark.