![](https://media.kbin.social/media/86/47/86473d7f94177ec90c7fdce8a872a75460689090ea259ab54daf5366d628ca82.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
You can combine both widget toolkits in one app‽
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
Maybe migrating to kbin.melroy.org
You can combine both widget toolkits in one app‽
🤯
I meant that the Japanese use the Chinese word for Pomelo to call the Yuzu
TIL The Japanese call Yuzu what we (the Chinese) call the Pomelo
Credit: DALL-E 3 / Microsoft Designer
na na-na-na na na, na na, na na na na nana!
It’s not just torrenting. Every user chooses what files they share, and these would be visible in search (and ranked by an internet speed transfer estimate), which makes discoverability a whole lot easier. If you want to download it, a direct transfer is initiated between that user and you computer only. You can also browse all files that a user has shared and chat with them about problems and whatnot (there also are chat rooms). Plus, since it’s not really torrenting apart from the concept, your download history isn’t targeted by popular tools that check out your activity on public trackers.
To combine the comments would probably require a revision to the lemmy protocol, plus an even bigger one to the backend software to keep backwards compatibility
…is that seriously your reason? Do you know about how Codeberg displayed something about a javascript error on top of that website for months? Mistakes happen, and as long as they have backup plans I don’t see how that is an issue.
Why does nobody ever recommend GitLab
Soulseek
Only if you completely disregard the userland and impound the definition of Linux to the kernel base
Users don’t contribute builds. They contribute a specification file for how the build is made, which through the AUR is downloaded and executed. You can see the package source for every AUR package, and most AUR helpers make you look at the specification file by default.
New packages on flathub are moderated, though I haven’t encountered any problems from AUR’s moderation model either other than it sometimes being slow but harmful stuff is removed pretty fast
I think that’s a Manjarno problem.
I think they want you to talk about the other aspects of use, such as compatibility with hardware an whether there can be significant productivity roadblocks. (That said, the only said roadblock I’ve met is not being able to project and not being able to run a specific Android app)
Flatpaks are isolated while I want to use my input method. Plus, they have larger sizes which can pile up over time
I think you’re confused. There is no warning letter, that’s just the takedown notice sent at the same time as the takedown.