![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/ca9b0de3-205f-47ca-a620-5fbddb680695.png)
I don’t see the hue in the screenshot
I don’t see the hue in the screenshot
Great questions. Honestly, I haven’t given it much though.
What would determine whether a source is added?
Hard question. Open to suggestions. Even if a post starts off with a click-bait-y title/source, our member typically post concrete sources and more resources in the comments. The discussions are a large part of the community and, as of now, we are not overrun with bad sources/posts. I inclined to create a plan, but not implement until we have more issues. I’d like to say the community decides, but it could lead to endless polls about sources. Thoughts?
Frequency of reports?
Absolutely would be one metric. So far, we get very, very, very few reports in the Space community. Mostly the reports are to remove trolls or unrelated content.
Moderator discretion?
It would probably start here. Not sure I’m comfortable making those decisions, but this is likely the reality until we have more discussions and decide on a path forward.
Community vote?
This would be pretty great…just not sure how to go about it. I guess we could sticky a vote post for a few weeks or something.
Could a source ever be removed from the list if its quality improves?
We would have to have a mechanism for this. Times change. So do journals/magazines/periodicals.
I believe that Otter is correct, there is no way to restrict domains on a community level. So this would be managed by the mods supported by reports from the community.
Yes. Fixed now. I’m super frustrated by the way lemmy overwrites the URL when you add an image.
I’m torn. On one hand, I’m fine with removing poor sources as there is so much garbage on the internet it’s good to keep it from invading all spaces. On the other hand, there’s some good discussion here…but it could be mainly about how garbage the article is…
Overall, there have been very few reports for poor sources/spam/fake articles. So report it and we’ll start removing it. This means we should probably compile a “deny list” for inappropriate sources.
You didn’t link a map or an article, FYI. It’s just a single photo of the perseverance backshell.
What NUC has a 3.5" bay?
Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force!! I both loved and hated that game
I’m not sure I understand what your question is. You are asking why to not torrent, but rather stream…but in relation to the services to setup yourself…
If you have decent internet…zero. why would you start to pay for services to get the same content you are already getting with a tiny bit less effort.
Recently got the pixel tablet and put GrapheneOS on it. I’ve been quite satisfied with it so far.
Honestly, I’m not upto date on the goals of this mission, but I really like thinking about a quadcopter (or dual quad) flying around on titan.
Your replies show you are too deeply involved in illusions to ever escape and make yourself smarter…
Will have to check it out. It’s a new name to me.
You can do anything with python. Just like you can do anything with C/C++. It’s a matter of time and knowledge. MATLAB + Simulink beats python hands down, that’s why it’s so widely used for controls. Why waste time and money to customize python to do everything.
You can walk anywhere…but I bet you don’t only use that mode of transport (i.e. you bicycle, drive a car, ride the bus/subway, fly, etc.)
Hard disagree. Nothing comes close to MATLAB + Simulink. Nothing is even trying to cover the same usages.
Yeah, I don’t have that option on jerboa and loading lemmy in a browser on mobile is a terrible experience.
Is that what’s in the top right?
What’s in the top right?
I guess I just have an ancient phone that can’t display it. I see it on the photos that people posted with the contrast turned up…but can’t see it at all on the original.
Trusty s10e finally showing its age…