That is what the data Sim is for that I mentioned above.

I’m super happy with jmp.chat

I was hesitant to try it, but once I ported my number over, it’s the best service I’ve ever used.

It’s $5/month, and your phone calls and texts are forwarded to an XMPP account. Voice mails are transcibed and sent as a text, with the included audiofile. It works over the internet, so you can have multiple phones with the number, and you can use your computer for the service as well.

For data, I use jmp.chats data only esim. It’s $7/year + $5/gig but the data never expires.

I was about to answer this, but decided I didn’t want that information in public.

However, the bank I use, which is a largish one, has an app that I’ve installed with the aurora store without microg or google play services on divestos and it complains that it won’t work without gsf, but it works fine after clicking ok.

This is incorrect. What you’d are doing while purely downloading is legal.

Bit torrent exposes you to liability not because you are downloading but because you’re sharing which courts have decided is distributing/performing, no matter how small the block you upload.

This is not an issue with Usenet.

deleted by creator

Is there a source for a genocide in China that doesn’t trace back to the apocalyptic christian Adrian Zen?

I would have spent more time at my wedding basking in the moment.

I cared too much being the good host. And I didn’t get to fully be present at the happiness of holding her hand in marriage.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

HP printers are literally why we have Linux.

Well, GNU, at least.

Linux in the same way as we wouldn’t have had Obama without 7 of 9’s husband trying to take her to a swingers club.

Fluffychat

Last week the first children (cause children always die first from starvation) died from starvation.

Say it with me: Israel is committing genocide you bigoted fuck.

deleted by creator

Yep, Misunderstood. Sorry.

You still haven’t answered why you think that is, or what your definition is, or what you think the ICJ’s definition is.

You should watch South Africa’s presentation:

https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k11/k11gf661b3

And the courts findings yourself, and get your news from a primary source:

https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1u/k1uwq4cxuv

I got bored: https://www.npr.org/2024/01/27/1227397107/icj-finds-genocide-case-against-israel-plausible-orders-it-to-stop-violations

That is literally the first hit from google. I know you won’t read it, but you should.

You should also really watch South Africa’s presentation: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k11/k11gf661b3

And the courts findings yourself, and get your news from a primary source: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1u/k1uwq4cxuv

I got bored: https://www.npr.org/2024/01/27/1227397107/icj-finds-genocide-case-against-israel-plausible-orders-it-to-stop-violations

That is literally the first hit from google. I know you won’t read it, but you should.

You should also really watch South Africa’s presentation: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k11/k11gf661b3

And the courts findings yourself, and get your news from a primary source: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1u/k1uwq4cxuv

I got bored. https://www.npr.org/2024/01/27/1227397107/icj-finds-genocide-case-against-israel-plausible-orders-it-to-stop-violations That is literally the first hit from google. I know you won’t read it, but you should.

You should also really watch South Africa’s presentation: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k11/k11gf661b3

And the courts findings yourself, and get your news from a primary source: https://webtv.un.org/en/asset/k1u/k1uwq4cxuv

We do know the conclusion to the prelimenary hearing to determine if Israel is plausibly committing genocide, which is what has happened so far. Pretending that that hasn’t happened is just bad faith arguing from a bigot.

Have fun justifying people starving to death with bellies full of grass caused by a government found by the ICJ to plausibly be committing genocide.

But you are bringing forth accusations, millenia old accusations, and they should be examined.

They have been. You’re ignoring anything that gives an answer you don’t like, and accusing the people who have paid attention of being antisemites, cheapening the word for actual antisemitism.

I think you are refusing to do any research on something you aren’t willing to change your mind about. I think nothing would change your mind, so you didn’t even bother watching any of the three parts of the hearing because you already knew what you would believe.

Your method of doing that is to never state a clear opinion, not engage in any logic, and respond to everything with questions.

I’ll follow suit. What do you think the purpose of that hearing was, and what do you think the conclusion was for the hearing?

But, as per my previous paragraph, I’d bet you didn’t even watch it.

deleted by creator