![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://infosec.pub/pictrs/image/ffa014c8-749c-4482-8599-b4be5064f8b1.png)
Oh I’ve got nothing against how the librarians handled it. I’m more concerned that their IT staff failed to properly shield the library from liabilities like OP.
Oh I’ve got nothing against how the librarians handled it. I’m more concerned that their IT staff failed to properly shield the library from liabilities like OP.
Yeah, this argument is bullshit once you actually know what you’re talking about instead of following some cult videos that teach you to repeat them.
I have to admit, I never thought of this as a way to bypass the captive portal (sorta just assumed everyone going through the public network would have to hit it, kinda of the equivalent to having everyone sign a liability waiver).
That’s because if that library’s network was properly configured it would work exactly like your expectation.
Yeah, having services blocked on Wi-Fi and not ethernet just tells me that their IT staff didn’t properly configure the network in public areas properly. That ethernet port should have been disabled, physically locked, or properly configured to use the public network like the Wi-Fi does.
I plugged into ethernet (as wifi w/captive portal does not work for me). I think clearnet worked but I have no interest in that. Egress Tor traffic was blocked and so was VPN. I’m not interested in editing all my scripts and configs to use clearnet, so the library’s internet is useless to me (unless I bother to try a tor bridge).
Yeah… Trying to bypass their security by using ethernet instead of Wi-Fi to use your own stuff that’s being blocked is tantamount to abusing the library’s services. Someone should let the IT staff know so they can properly block those services on ethernet as well.
Don’t forget the death star absorbing an entire star’s energy to fire
Or because anyone in China working normal hours already left for the weekend because they’re 12+ hours ahead of the US.
Samsung store does that too. It’s quite annoying
Makes 0 difference. The charging circuit is in charge of that logic and will accept whatever voltage is supplied (within spec) and step it down to what the battery needs.
I wonder if this usage captures vehicles as well. I know the 2016 Honda I owned was running android 4.4 or so.
They all do it now (except USPS?)
Actually other person got it wrong, but I can confirm that it is fixed in the latest version. I don’t see examples of this very often, but I did run across one today.
10% chance of being right
No text image links in post bodies. Usually see them in the format [](link here) don’t show up at all.
That’s not efficiency, that’s speed. I charging efficiency is your charger drawing 35W and your phone only getting charged with 30W.
Why use your own resources when you can use someone else’s?
I believe that’s an android feature. If you’re not using it for videos, you can disable it altogether.
It’s not like I dropped Netflix and opted to pirate their content instead because of their password sharing restrictions or anything. Nah, can’t be that.
Lemmy really has a problem with too many communities. It feels like everyone is creating a new community for their super specific topic and put their one post about it there.
Yeah, I agree that’s the easiest path to take in properly securing it.