I saw a beggar the other day who was literally holding his hand out cupped. It was intense.
I saw a beggar the other day who was literally holding his hand out cupped. It was intense.
They forgot to blank out her name though.
I remember smoking outside a pub near Chinatown with a mate something like ten years ago when two Chinese people went by speaking Chinese, and he said “they should be speaking English; this is Britain,” so I asked why, and he couldn’t explain why. Just on a vague principle.
It’s astonishingly obvious once it’s pointed out:
There’s no B#/Cb and no E#/Fb, so the groups of two black notes are between C and E, and the groups of three are between F and B.
font I liked in a book on calligraphy
They’re called hands, because you do them with your hand. A font is a given instance of a typeface, which is a design of a script. Now you can be pedantic too!
Never thought I’d read that word on this website!
I don’t think this answer is really in the spirit of “no stupid questions”.
Hier, Archie! (flauwe woordspeling, excuses)
You’re very lucky to have such friends.
Ah, nou, dat verklaart het wel!
Ik heb ergens gelezen dat Volt een zetel van BBB hebben overgenomen. Leek mij raar!
I remember once looking over my sister’s shoulder while she was on MSN messenger and a mutual friend chose that moment to confess (via MSN messenger) that he fucked pillows for practice.
I feel like I know less about the weather there having looked at these bars.
I’ve got a Firefox extension that blocks websites after an amendable period of time is spent on them, so I limit my time on social media websites to 1 hour a day because I felt I was spending too much time reading mindless drivel, and I often don’t even reach an hour nowadays, having only looked at Lemmy.
I didn’t say anything about it being the best method, and just that something helps my case doesn’t make my logic circular. You could say that it’d be circular to say “the scientific method relies on the real world existing, and the real world existing relies on the scientific method”, but that’s exactly what I’m saying is not the case; in fact, my whole point is that you can’t use the scientific method to prove that the real world exists exactly for that reason. I literally typed “not the other way around”. The results of the measurements you make of the non-phenomenal world exist themselves in the non-phenomenal world so they can’t be proof that that world exists. I don’t know how to put it in simpler terms!
deleted by creator
I’m not talking about the spiritual world and I don’t even really know what you mean by it.
This is a joke from the Simpsons, innit?
Oh wow! How long had you been married to her?