What is

Yeah, it’s corporate astrology

All food is organic. Unless you have a crop like a chicken (you don’t), you really shouldn’t put any inorganic materials in your body.

Don’t forget sesquipedalian!

But you said we were putting someone down, who are we putting down? Like, it’s literally not even incorrect, it just sounds like it if taken out of context like this. Chill out friend, it’s just victimless goofs in here!

Who is being put down? Can’t people just laugh at something that’s funny?

Aaah, got it.

If it leans more comedy than sci-fi, wouldn’t it be more Red Dwarf than Trek?

But I’m not a dumbass right? Thank god

Sorry I didn’t read and respond to that wall of text, lol. All I’ll say is, If you need 6 paragraphs to explain why it’s a good joke, it’s not a good joke.

deleted by creator

But it doesn’t make it better for anyone, and it does make it worse for the rest of us, so…

Lol, I never suggested anything about the author’s writing process and I certainly never even implied that I thought you were a dumbass, which I don’t. But now I’m not convinced you’re not the actual cartoonist, since you seem to have intimate knowledge of their creation process and their recreational habits. It’s not a “character study”—you would need characters for that—it’s a setup with no punchline, it’s half a joke. Actually, it’s worse, it’s a joke with a decent punchline, followed by a whole extra panel that just restates what the reader already learned in the previous panel with the actual punchline, making me feel like the author thinks I’m a dumbass.

“Don’t worry, I think he’s gonna pull it!”

I think that’s a very generous read, and I just don’t see it. The first three panels are well done, but the last adds nothing. It’s like someone ending a Little Johnny joke with “and then the teacher sent him to the principal’s office” instead of with whatever dirty thing Johnny said that was supposed to be the actual punchline.

Except the last panel isn’t poignant either. Like I said, it’s useless. It would be just as poignant without it, and if they had actually written a punchline, it could have been funny too.

Needs a punchline. That last panel is completely pointless and wastes a good setup imo.

Well yeah, it’s an impossible hypothetical, it’s not supposed to have a point. Actually, it did have a point, which it very easily accomplished: trigger incels. Just remember, there would be no reactionary media without media consumers being reactionary.

Wow, y’all cannot handle a little trolling huh. Are incels really taking this whole thing seriously? Just remember guys, it is personal, hahaha

Just so you know, this comment reads like you really like Jeffrey Epstein and you think he was set up…