![](https://lemmy.thesanewriter.com/pictrs/image/9476cfcb-383b-4961-bf72-c960dcb0d8cb.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0130a5eb-ebd6-402a-961b-6dc94d9541ca.jpeg)
And the dishwasher shredded my laundry. Stuff just isn’t built to last anymore.
And the dishwasher shredded my laundry. Stuff just isn’t built to last anymore.
I have Photon running at the same subdomain level as my main UI, but it’s easy enough to host both.
Unfortunately, the software for both running and displaying Lemmy is still in beta. While it’s still in active development, it’s probably for the best that we stay niche because bugs and stability issues turn off a lot of people permanently from the platform. That’s why I’m waiting until the Lemmy 1.0 release to really advertise, I don’t think we’re ready for that kind of growth yet.
Seems to. It federated to me at least, so it looks like it was saved correctly.
I would be inclined to agree with you if they didn’t get rid of Premium Light. I think charging users for avoiding ads is completely reasonable, we live in a Capitalist country and video hosting isn’t cheap. Even still, axing Premium Light shows a desire to screw over users in order to achieve more profit, which in my mind makes YouTube scummy.
Yes. Making videos is a job and the creators need money to eat and remain housed, it’s reasonable for them to want to be compensated for their work.
It probably used some weird webview shit they routed through Edge, so when you uninstalled it the entire system broke.
Politics are as subjective as the right to privacy. There isn’t a hard logical truth to it, it’s what people think is moral. Considering that, and considering that right-wing billionaires aren’t known for being friendly to privacy, I think it’s fine to bring politics into this discussion.
It also shows how detached some of these billionaires really are. A VR system is not yet affordable for the majority of Americans, and the technology has much more development to do before it’s as widespread as video game consoles, never mind PCs.
Not really, but it would still be more helpful to explain how it’s better.
I completely agree. I’m personally holding off on heavy promotion of this platform until we hit 1.0. If people join too early and are turned off by the lack of polish, they may not come back after it’s fixed.
Unfortunately, this isn’t far from the actual rhetoric they use.
The company said that it will still have opt-out controls in “select countries” without specifying which ones.
I’m guessing that’s how they plan to get around that. They will leave the toggle enabled for people registered in EU countries, and disable it everywhere else. A fairly risky way to handle it in my opinion.
It truly is disgusting that they’ve made this model. Tinder has always been severely flawed in my opinion, but this makes it several times worse.
That genuinely reads like satire. What an awful corporate model, extracting every penny out of the workers and consumers to force that line to keep going up.
I think the idea behind this is to spend your entire life alternating between periods of work and retirement. It’s definitely an idea I could get behind, though society now is not built for it.
For me it’s because I don’t use it very often, mostly just archiving stuff every few months or so.
Thanks for answering your own question, this is useful information.
I like the dashes, they make the options look like options to me.
It’s based on posts and comments.