• 0 Posts
  • 54 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle



  • flossdaily@lemmy.worldtoRisa@startrek.websiteBasically the plot of TNG
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t particularly care for this plot.

    Q is omniscient, so he already knew that our history is rife with examples of good people and bad people, brilliant and ignorant… and he comes to judge a fairly utopian future society of a unified, post-capitalism, post-religion Earth? My dude, they’re doing fine.



  • flossdaily@lemmy.worldtoComic Strips@lemmy.worldCapitalism
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    The problem with blanket attacks on capitalism is that it ignores the fact that the US became an economic superpower under capitalism, and we built the strongest middle class in history under capitalism WHEN WE MIXED IN SOCIALIST PROGRAMS.

    BASIC economics shows that BY FAR capitalism is the most efficient way to generate wealth.

    It sounds profoundly ignorant to be against that system.

    Instead, we should be talking about what to do with the wealth it generates.

    Bernie Sanders “Democratic socialism” is actually “capitalist socialism”. It leaves in place all the profit incentives and machinery of innovation and production, but then it redistributes wealth away from the hoarders at the top, and gives it back to the workers who generated it.

    This is a much more compelling system to fight for than just a blanket “capitalism bad!” argument.



  • That there wasn’t a single mainstream Republican who stood up to Trump during his presidency.

    I mean, come on. Who wrote this?

    We’re supposed to believe that EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN in government went from taking about how unfit Trump was when he was a candidate … to standing behind him 100% even when he cozied up to Russia, paid hush money to a porn star, and lied about a Presidential election?












  • flossdaily@lemmy.worldtoMildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldSo much for that dream.
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Not necessarily. You can put safeguards in place. For example our appeals courts don’t ever decide fact. They make rulings about the law.

    You can also have bipartisan panels that oversee this, with extremely limited power unless they rule unanimously.

    You also have congressional oversight adding another check.

    If the original inception and scope of all these things is cleverly drafted, we could see a lot of new media pop up that is vastly superior to the crap we have now.