![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sopuli.xyz/pictrs/image/8167d883-d9f5-4066-8ae7-80e8b3506722.webp)
Very interesting! Could you provide some summary of what the trends are or may be visualize the results? I am new to this kind of data
Very interesting! Could you provide some summary of what the trends are or may be visualize the results? I am new to this kind of data
Is the posted image from the time the article was published, so 9 years ago?
I bought Mirrors Edge: Catalyst. I really liked the original and doing a few runs from time to time is really nice
Free software is not about free of charge, but about freedom. If you publish open source software under a license which allows commercial use or selling the software, you have given consent. If you don‘t like that, change the license. (Users will still be able to use the software for free if they choose to compile it themself, because the source code is available.
Redhat does exactly what you are describing: Packageing open source software into a paid Linux distribution and I would say they had an immense net positive effect on Linux doing this. I believe that this the point. Don‘t be an asshole. If you partly profit of someone else open source software, give them money, bug reports, bug fixes, recognition, etc. Be part of the community.
In the Veritasium video about IQ they said that the American military actually has limits on how many people with below average IQ they can recruit. They found out that those people had a higher chance of dieing and needed way more training, so less people with higher IQ were better for the military success.
It is very normalized in the south of Germany, but generally Germany is very pro homeopathy so so it is even subsided by the public health care system.
Not quite, it‘s only restricting competitors and so all companies and home labbers can still use it for free and contribute as in free speech.
However this can bring a lot more financial sustainability to a project. I don‘t know the specifics, but the main problem is that companies make profit of the software, but don’t invest enough money back into the product. This cannot be good for users. Open source must be financially stable.
Also right now all those competitors (and users) can create a fork and maintain it. So it is up to the community what will happen to the project.
What do you use tailscale on the Steam Deck for?
Cool service! Is the code open source?
Some cruise ships equip Starlink nowadays
There actually is! It is still on my list to actually try it out, but it claims to do exactly what you want: https://fileparty.co
Tell me about your experience, once you have used it :)
Unfortunately it is not FOSS, but I believe peer-to-peer (hard to know for sure without the source)
Buy a framework laptop instead!
In my opinion federation is the better peer to peer / decentralized service. Power is not centralized, but everything can be run as efficiently as a centralized service.
A screenshot from Mastdon, yay!
If you into city building and realtime strategy Widelands might be of interest for you. It is an open source game inspired by the Settlers II, but with much more depth and with online play. It is really freaking cool and you can play it for over 6h. It is installable via Discover on the desktop.
The problem is: The larger the usage of RHEL inside a company the more likely they do not need the support anymore, because they can have your own department do it instead. So those companies don’t pay for bug fixes or general Linux development, which is a problem. If you want a healthy Linux ecosystem large companies need to pay the maintainers! I don’t care if they do it through Redhat or directly.
Definitely Widelands! It captures the heart of settlers 2 while also extending it in ways that were really needed to make it even more enjoyable. Also with the right controller layout it plays very ergonomically. (Use a trigger to switch to map scrolling via the touchpads)