![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/d3d059e3-fa3d-45af-ac93-ac894beba378.png)
The Stargate movie was good, but SG-1 far surpassed it.
The Stargate movie was good, but SG-1 far surpassed it.
How would that help?
I have my media on a disk separate from the rest of the VM. I set that disk to not be included in snapshots, then snapshot the VM before upgrades.
This has different meaning depending on if you read that as a statement or as a command.
They were when the name was made, but due to changes in the manufacturing process, they aren’t anymore. The name stuck, though.
https://www.popsci.com/two-by-four-lumber-measurements-explained/
They could be requiring phishing-resistant MFA, which OTP is not
They are now. Not when people were going out west on wagons. As stated above, it’s because of historical reasons.
Slo-mo guys just show up with a fat stack of hundos
Appropriate username
What does this statement mean then? Why would you pirate something if you had no interest in it? If it’s interesting enough to download, it must have been worth something to you.
Sure. But it doesn’t mean it’s worth the asking price to me. Because I can’t negotiate on that price, my interest is effectively worth nothing to the company.
Let’s pretend for a minute that piracy wasn’t an option. In that scenario, I simply wouldn’t watch it. Therefore, there’s no potential that the company will get money from me, and there’s no opportunity for them to get money. Because there’s no opportunity, there’s no opportunity cost for the company to me pirating the content.
That’s what people are talking about when they talk about the company losing money to piracy. They’re talking about the unrealized potential income of people that would have paid for the content, but didn’t because they pirated it instead. The counterpoint to that is that there’s no way I’m going to pay for it. Therefore, there’s no unrealized potential income. They’re not out of anything by me pirating their company.
At this point I think we’re actually just beating a pot of glue
doesn’t allow you to do anything you can’t do without it.
That’s false. It allows you to not need a password to unlock the volume at boot.
Im really confused why people think TPM needs to be involved in anyway when using LUKS.
Because it’s convenient
The disk will be decrypted on boot, but then they’ll have to contend with needing a password to log in
Also disable picture in picture
The one I know of was Florida
Eh, Guinness is about the lightest stout I’ve ever had
I even have a blu ray drive