• 0 Posts
  • 81 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 5th, 2023

help-circle


  • What I’ve learned from this comment is that there is an extremely small percentage of gals who may dislike the term ladies based on a very obscure reason, so until they tell me their personal objections the reasonable thing is to go with the common societal usage of the word.

    You’re probably getting down voted because it’d be the same as if I got on my high horse and replied, “well you oughta learn that some people don’t even like the word ‘person’ because it reminded them of existing”.

    Like sure, that happened to you and it’s great that you can now refer to your friend the way they prefer. But that’s such a niche situation that I don’t think it should be conveyed in a manner as if people were inadequate for not knowing. Makes a good story to tell though.

    If you’d just said “fun fact, some people blah blah blah” it carries a very different tone then “good start, now learn that blah blah blah”

    One implies it is an experience you had, the other implies it is an experience that all others should’ve known.



  • there’s a great planet money podcast that covers this

    It turns out childcare is just a very labor intensive sector due to the amount of adults needed to watch the kids. This means that most of the costs for daycare are already labor:

    In fast food, labor is 25% of the total costs. Estimates for day care - it’s, like, more than 70% of total costs.

    Given that labor is already a disproportionate amount of the costs, raising salaries a little has a large effect on the increased cost that parents would have to pay.

    For some real world numbers, daycare is around 1.3k/month for me. The school does 3 kids to 1 teacher, so that’s a max of 3.9k/month of income per 1 teachers salary. So already, in an ideal world where 100% of what parents pay go directly to the teacher, the max they’d make is 48k/year.

    Factor in things like renting the facilities, utility costs, administrative and security staff, taxes, etc. and you quickly start to see why even though it seems like parents are paying a lot, there’s just not that much money to go around.








  • How DARE he provide voluntary game show contestants that chance to win money as well as the ability to walk away at every moment.

    It’s almost as if the contestants have their own motivations and reasons driving their willing participation in the video.

    Like, honestly, half the times that shit just sounds fun. Wife and I found out that NASA was literally doing the same thing as the 100 days in a box challenge as part of a simulation for mars, and we were hyped to do it. Throw in a cash incentive? Even better.

    But here’s the kicker: if we weren’t going to do it together, we wouldn’t want to do it, and that’s A VOLUNTARY DECISION I JUST MADE. Some folks would have fun participating given their situation. This isn’t squid games where participants are facing harm.

    OP is just mad. Their arguments really remind me of “the unborn are a convenient group of people to advocate for”. You’ll notice OP has absolutely no evidence that the participants believed they were taken advantage of.

    EDIT: I googled “mr beast taking advantage of contestants” and the results are generally: others taking advantage of Mr. Beast and discussions about the morality of Mr Beast, but I don’t see an article about how a contestant says they were taken advantage of.