![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0943eca5-c4c2-4d65-acc2-7e220598f99e.png)
kinda does
“Kinda” meaning not actually.
as close as anything can be guaranteed
So not guaranteed then.
kinda does
“Kinda” meaning not actually.
as close as anything can be guaranteed
So not guaranteed then.
Spreading out stock purchases across the market guarantees returns over the long run.
No it doesn’t.
free software communities
TheLinuxExperiment on YouTube
LOL
That doesn’t surprise me.
governance is important to not have a space filled with awful people
Snigger They think there are people who aren’t awful.
deleted by creator
every instance has some users worth keeping in some conversation
That doesn’t contradict what I said.
Refraining from making the fediverse an archipelago where people refuse to talk to anyone who had the misfortune of picking the wrong instance
The fediverse cannot now be made that because the fediverse is already that.
If you ask in earnest, you’ll get good responses.
This is not the case. Every time I’ve asked in earnest, I’ve faced mobs of lunatics.
Do they genuinely believe the shit they’re peddling or are they paid propagandists or is their something more nefarious afoot.
From my interactions, I’ve come to the conclusion that they’re mostly seriously broken people who’ve discovered Marx, convinced themselves that capitalism is the cause of all suffering and believe socialism is the solution that will free them from their trauma. The degree of their attachment to socialism is a reflection of the degree of their suffering and brokenness.
If they weren’t so toxic, they’d be deserving of compassion and forebearance.
if we want Lemmy to be something besides a place for Soviet simps to hide from criticism
There is definitely a place for Soviet simps in the Fediverse, it’s just in a corner all by itself. That’s the beauty of the Fediverse.
Every time we fragment the fediverse we make it overall worse.
Only if your conception of better/worse is focussed on user count rather than user quality.
Average users don’t even understand what they’re looking at when it comes to decentralized networks
Refraining from defederation won’t change that.
ROFL… oooof!
I’m asking if the wave functions in the particles around us could collapse in such a way that they could absorb light, or even change the composition of atoms?
Your question doesn’t make sense.
a wave function “cascade”
I’m not sure what you’re referring to. It sounds like you’ve heard some physics words, misunderstood them, and are regurgitating them based on that misunderstanding.
The scientific method doesn’t rule out any phenomena, it simply provides a method of investigating phenomena.
Frakes’ hair, wow :-)
This is essentially just about gitlab privileges. It seems like you’re making a big deal about nothing. Calling a particular category of privilege holders a “team” seems excessive, possibly even deluded. Likewise, describing the collection of different gitlab privilege roles as an “organisational structure” seems silly.
I’m glad you’ve realised that what you wrote was incorrect.