![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/e0bf356b-ce6d-41fe-bb06-826010bd6f05.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/10433bc7-e46d-46fa-810c-a5c246fc3a94.png)
I agree. For me, it wasn’t Kenobi but Book of Boba Fett. I really enjoyed the show, however, when I went online, somehow all Star Wars fans called it the worst ever made.
Male 18-year-old FOSS and GNU/Linux activist and user
I agree. For me, it wasn’t Kenobi but Book of Boba Fett. I really enjoyed the show, however, when I went online, somehow all Star Wars fans called it the worst ever made.
I’d call that a win
No, that is not the reason. Many people prefer multiple pages for reading long-form online articles. Also quite common on major newspapers.
Okay, but Ephera’s comment was about the (non-)vegan ingredients.
That would be vegan though
Your hands are supposed to be clean from washing with soap and water. The dryer is just there to make your hands dry because moving around with wet hands isn’t very comfortable.
Coffee cologne?
I agree completely. Blocked the instance only now despite them becoming more and more annoying each month.
Debian-based distros are usually the ones with the most official support and documentation with regard to Android.
Windows -> OpenSUSE Tumbleweed -> Ubuntu -> Debian GNU/Linux -> EndeavourOS
Currently using Debian and EndeavourOS in parallel as the distributions I have settled on.
Look at Deng […] he improved the lives of 108 or 109 people
Lemmy.ml? Makes sense. Your supposed hero “Deng” was a maniacal tyrannical dictator that was responsible for the deaths of countless students at the Tiananmen Square Massacre. He was an offender who committed crimes against humanity and he should be treated as such.
Definitely a fabulous ending, but the tie-in with Calypso only made me more curious about what all that is about. Maybe there’s potential for a follow-up show now that the 4th millennium has been thoroughly established.
Isn’t Lemmy pretty much that?
Why are they all clothed so strangely?
A lab work group, like that one on Reddit. I cannot remember the name and I sure as hell will not go to that damned site, but it was basically full of graduate students and technicians that shared stories from their labs.
Thank you for your service o7
That’s just a straight up lie or an error on the part of the operator (you). Ubuntu is very stable with regard to running supported software, and rock-solid when it comes to updates not breaking things.
There is no “Linux UI” per se, the closest thing to it is Bash I guess. I find it important to make people understand that GNU/Linux is not bound to any particular GUI like Windows or MacOS are. With them, their less knowledgeable users equate the GUI to the OS, which is fair because they are so tightly integrated and not changeable. But for GNU/Linux, the visual UX+UI are entirely modular and not part of the operating system itself. As I said, the Bash shell may be interpreted as a kind of UI standard for FOSS Unix and Unix-like systems, but it’s also not necessarily required in that it can be replaced with another shell program. Of course, not knowing you I cannot tell how experienced you are with GNU/Linux, so you could know all of this already, therefore don’t feel like I’m trying to belittle you or anything, this is meant to be genuinely helpful by giving people that have no prior exposure to GNU/Linux some glances into what makes it special.
Edit: scratch that last part, I’ve just now noticed that you are the same person that said they had already transitioned partially
I would be very careful with the kind of speculation the other commenter proposed. Those things are very popular science-ey and almost unverifiable at the moment, it’s hard to tell if there is even any actual academic research behind many of these “theories” that get thrown around by some laypersons. And even if there are actual publications behind such proposals, as in this case, the validity of their theses is far from certain. It is a very theoretical domain in which new knowledge can easily be “hallucinated” without much connection to physical reality, even - or in particular - by professions.