Tell me you’ve never been outside of your crappy state and have never seen a European city nor ever seen a modern European apartment.
You do understand other countries have actual buildings that consist of more than some wood and styrofoam, right?
People can read your other comments as well, you know? Your account is a textbook about insecure masculinity, Mr. „I am the man other men wish they could be“ 😂
Riots and protests don’t need your approval or applause. They happen because the majority of people are too complacent. If everyone was already aboard we’d just do those things, you know. You probably don’t understand this, because you never stuck out your neck for anything in your life.
The argument was not whether fixed cost exceed the variable cost or vice versa.
The argument was that a lot of people severely underestimate the actual cost of any given trip because they only account for (a subset of) the variable costs (i.e. gas).
And it’s true. Rarely anyone does full costing when it comes to cars because „the fixed cost are there no matter how much you drive“.
It’s definitely going to be very popular with some crews groups…
Yes, because people in the US cannot be trusted to drive at safe speeds while the EU regulates 80/100 km/h with a trailer.
Ahahaha, tell me you’ve never left your country, probably not even your fucking state.
Yeah, all of Europe doesn’t know how to tow, and is „sketchy as fuck“. 🤡
This is perfectly legal and safe.
You know what’s sketchy as fuck? The US, which has 3 times more road deaths per capita than the EU.
Now go back to your wankpanzer, please.
Yo do understand there’s countries outside the US, right? 🤡
Lol. Having a US driving license means you might be qualified to safely ride a tricycle on a training course.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
You post this: “And because California law requires self-driving companies to report every significant crash, we know a lot about how they’ve performed” as a comment to an article where it’s being revealed that said company covered up some kind of important detail about a “significant crash”?
Okay 👌
deleted by creator
And another ad hominem. Bye.
Edit: and if you cannot see a difference between a scientist advocating for bikes and someone advocating for a known hazardous drug you are completely lost.
The lead authours stated personal goal is to increase proportion of bicycle use from 8% to 25%
Yes, scientists have opinions and agendas.
Only that you maybe shouldn’t be so quick to shit on the guy who raised his eyebrow
They. Did. Not. Read. The. Study.
They, in essence, did a study that “confirmed” that they themselves are better people than 92% of the population.
Look, if you want to dismiss a study, do so, I couldn’t care less. But so far you both haven’t brought anything but ad hominem against the authors.
Governments are clamping down on protests against climate change: * silence *
Some idiots cut down speed cameras the people living there specifically asked for: YEAH! Fuck the police!!!1! Rage against the machine!!!1! Fuck mass surveillance!!!1!
Priorities , I guess.