• Fake4000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    No. They are two different projects.

    Lineage is about providing a Google free version of android AOSP and supporting as many phones as possible.

    Graphene is about making a privacy centric version of android that can run Google apps sandboxed. Graphene only supports pixel phones.

    • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      7 months ago

      Lineage is not about providing a google free version of Android. It does not contain google apps, for licensing reasons, probably also to let the user choose. But it does not go further, all the other stuff like captive portal check, agps, dns etc still uses google servers. It’s not “degoogled” in any way. Love lineage btw but we need to be aware of what it is and isn’t.

      • atocci@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 months ago

        I wonder where this misconception is coming from, it’s the second time in the last few days I’ve seen it. I can’t remember custom roms ever coming with the Google apps preinstalled, you’d always need to flash them separately before the first boot (thanks XDA). That’s why we have MindTheGApps.

        • 520@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          It used to be that Cyanogenmod (the precursor project to LineageOS) shipped with Google apps pre installed until they got a cease and desist from Google.

        • vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          I can’t remember custom roms ever coming with the Google apps preinstalled, you’d always need to flash them separately before the first boot

          Many of them do these days. Which is a bit annoying when you want a no-gapps variant and can’t find it.

          • atocci@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            That’s interesting! They aren’t supposed to do that though, right? It goes against Google’s policy.

        • baatliwala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Degoogle is the wrong word for lineage because it hasn’t been “engoogled” in the first place, it doesn’t ship with Google services at all. If you simply install the base ROM you don’t have Google.

          The question is if you want to replace Google with mock Google services so certain apps relying on GMS still work, or if you want to replace it completely with FOSS alternatives.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      And a few non-pixel devices, though it’s incredibly short list. Expansion was to start last fall, afaik.

      • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’d love to see this come to fruition. I’ve wanted Graphene since I first heard about it but refuse to pay the Google tax for admission and live with all the restrictions a Google device comes with

          • DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            By “Google tax” I mean having to buy one of their devices and the “restrictions” I’m referring to are the lack of headphone jack and micro SD card slot. They may mean nothing to you or others but they’re both bare minimum requirements for myself and others. For as long as they aren’t available on Pixel devices, I will never consider a Pixel.

            I also hate the ass-backwards hole punch camera but that seems to be even more of a losing battle than the other common sense features I mentioned.

  • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve always found it both weird and ironic that GrapheneOS is only available for Pixel phones when the whole principle of the project is basically “we don’t trust Google”.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 months ago

      The pixel device is (as far as I’m aware) the only mainstream device that allows you to re-lock the boot loader.

      Otherwise, once a phone is cracked, it remains cracked. I’m not entirely sure what that buys, but that’s why they do it

      • afunkysongaday@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 months ago

        Most brands allow relocking bootloader. But after that you with be only able to use stock rom. Pixel lets you lock the bootloader with a different signature, so in this example you are basically able to lock it to only boot grapheneos and nothing else.

      • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        They also have an accessible secure element that graphene uses a lot. I’d recommend listening to the podcast interviews with graphene staff

      • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Security. You’re caught with your pants down if you have any personal data on a phone with an unlocked bootloader. All data is effectively plaintext, all security is nullified with trivial difficulty. This is the actual worst-case scenario for journalists, whistleblowers, or anyone who is or may become under surveillance for any reason.

        • Username@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s wrong, data is still usually encrypted.

          A locked bootloader ‘just’ prevents tampering with the OS. You’re only pwned when using the phone after it has been manipulated.

          • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yeah but if you have the phone with an unlocked bootloader and anyone gains access to it (physical or otherwise)…

    • throwaway12345678@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This isn’t true at all. Daniel Micay has stated multiple times the goal isn’t to degoogle, it’s to provide a secure and private OS that’s actually usable. They worked tirelessly to integrate GMS compatibility layer and give users the choice to install sandboxed Google play for app compatability.

      GrapheneOS has said countless times that by using Linux and other open source softwares that Google contributes massive amounts of code, you ARE inherently trusting them to not be malicious https://nitter.1d4.us/GrapheneOS/status/1672998518573740033#m

      Google play does what it says and they are very open about what data they collect, which is obviously a lot. GrapheneOS stops much of this collection through sandboxing, where you can deny any permissions you desire.

    • wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      G provides a phone that is incredibly friendly to developers (as friendly as it can get without free hookers and blow), in all aspects, which makes sense considering they want devs to adopt android as their platform for apps and stuff. This also goes into things like security vulnerabilies/research, and also alternative android-based systems. It’s humorous but not at all ironic. Be friendly to devs, and make money hand over fist because of it.

      It’s logical for both, just for very different motives.

  • rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    What happened to LineageOS?

    Nothing. What makes you think something happened to it?

    • the_weez@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I ran sailfish on my 1+1 back in the day for a while. It was a nice OS but the app ecosystem was just horrible and their android compatibility just never worked right for me.

        • the_weez@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, I feel the same about Firefox OS, Ubuntu mobile, Web OS, and Meego. I wish we had a third option at least, that was a little more viable for people that have a handful of apps for widgets and stuff. At this point I think that any real contender is going to have to bake android compatibility in to hope to make a dent in the market at all. Too many normal people expect to be able to use their phone to control some gadgets they have bought, smart stuff and iot gear. Without rewriting all the various apps to control those gadgets people are going to be hesitant to try anything else going forward IMHO.

  • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s still very much alive! Still getting regular updates on my S10 and even security updates for my OnePlus 3t.

  • atocci@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m using LineageOS 20 right now, waiting on 21. I’ve been getting weekly updates since I installed it, so things seem fine for them.

  • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    LineageOS is still in development. While there’s no official Android 14 (LineageOS 21) yet, there are development builds available, and LOS 20 is still receiving regular official weekly updates.

  • Mojojojo1993@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    Aren’t they differing systems? Graphene was mostly pixel / Google devices. Whereas lineageos was a hunch of different devices. Lineageos was an evolution from cryomod