… its a website run by the US Government. Why does it have such large downtimes in this day and age?

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m going to have a guess and suggest that the website is probably integrated with some much older mainframe system and a batch process or several batch processes run daily overnight to shuttle data between the two systems to keep them updated and in sync.

    Syncing the two sets of data while the database is live and changing is a pain the the bum, so they freeze it while the data transfers are taking place.

    • really@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the real answer. Main frame batch processing.

      And till you haven’t experienced it, it seems like an excuse. Why can’t you simply do it all the time. Why can’t you get rid of the mainframe, etc.

      But if only it were that easy. There is a reason IBM can still acquire multi billion dollar companies and then run them into the ground.

      My company has maybe a couple million customers and can’t get rid of its mainframe and in areas that it’s gotten the process away from the mainframe, batch patronizing is still a thing. Because that is the only way to guarantee integrity.

      So yea. I wish your comment gets more up votes. Because it is not a conspiracy, it is a technical limitation.

      • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I like working with legacy systems. Post something, go fart around on your phone for fifteen minutes while you wait for it to post.

        • ngdev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I had to do some legacy app modernization for one of the largest telecoms companies in the US, and their mainframe system and the UI, while ugly, performed so much faster than the modern approach.

          Given, we weren’t the most talented team out there, but rendering the UI on the server side was unmatched in performance versus what we could get out of a web browser. I was the UI guy so I didn’t really touch mainframe side, but it was wild to me that they made this system like 30 years ago and it worked so much better than our modern implementation

          • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not sure whether I want to work with your team or not, considering all fifteen of those minutes farting I get to bill to the client

            • ngdev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              lol i was more or less just remarking on the fact that yes mainframe and other legacy apps are pretty old, however that does not mean that they’re necessarily worse than a modern implementation

      • krolden@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its the conspiracy of capitalism. If nothing else this is another example of how megacorps have more say in government operations that the entire population.

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It can be, but it’s also an issue of “move fast and break things” doesn’t work in all environments.

          You don’t want your bank to have an oops with your checking account, or your medical records to get messed up because someone didn’t code it well enough. If it works and is stable, there needs to be a demonstrable benefit and a guarantee that it will keep working when moving to a newer system. Usually on a budget of “what do you mean you need a budget, just do it”.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This also explains, very basically, why financial systems are the way they are. The backend is ancient but they know how it works so it stays the same and we see it’s weird quirks all the time.

      • Sparking@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        More like, they know of they try to change, and their is an issue and people’s statements payments are at risk, it’s their ass.

        • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh it’s hugely risky. I don’t blame anyone for not wanting to change it. But most people don’t know it’s all held together with duck tape and bubblegum.

  • sijt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I particularly enjoy the “if you need immediate assistance” note for a telephone line that’s open even fewer hours than the website. it’s positioned as an alternative to the site, but absolutely isn’t. Also, if that message is only displayed when the site is closed, there are no hours when the phone line is open but the site is closed, so who’s it helping? You couldwrite it down and call it when it’s open, but the site is also going to be open then, several hours earlier in fact, so is less “immediate” than the site that’s closed.

    • Ech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s less “this line is for emergencies” and more “our online process could takes days to get a response, here’s a line to a real human”.

  • popemichael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most government sites from NY also keep business hours

    I asked my family’s lawyer about it and he said that the time open and closed is a law. So they have to “close down” certain sites at certain times to comply with those laws

  • CannaVet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    We know why but pointing out how Republicans only policy position is “explicitly kneecap everything so we can privatize it and funnel money to our friends at non negotiated rates 5x the normal end user retail cost” is apparently not allowed because some guys like guys and some people want to alter a pronoun by one letter or some such shit.

      • CannaVet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Plenty of systems operate just fine without 4-6 hours of daily scheduled downtime. This is just deliberate.

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      at this point i don’t even think its that deep anymore sometimes. Sure they do things like that. But at this point…sometimes they really are just fucking cartoon villains. Being evil just because.

      • CannaVet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s how I feel gesturing broadly at the 3 or 4 states they’re still actively fighting against minimum marriage age laws.

        Their voters out here voting for them to “protect children” from pronouns, from books, from learning - then turn a blind eye when they vote to make marrying at 12 legal again or to force 12 year olds to give birth or to send 12 year olds back to the mines. Not only are the politicians cartoon villains, in 2023 so are their voters. Full Stop.

      • earthquake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        translation: “It’s impossible to have a conversation about the GOP “Starve the beast” policy because the conversation will be derailed by “LGBT people exist, something something woke ideology””

  • netvor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    …aand, we’re back to Web 0.0.

    By the way, is this how most sites are going to work in Metaverse?

  • ThaijsClan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, you see now, if you reverse the letters in the website address it spells exactly why it has issues.

  • phamanhvu01@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    One might say that this website has some of the best union behind it, perharps on the entire planet.

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Could be too limit the number of requests that ultimately ended up needing to be processed by a “real human”. Knowing government that was human might be literally some person in the back transcribing the digital requests to paper so that some technophobe boss can review or file it…

    • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That would funnel all the requests to the same 8hs at day, instead of letting them distribute on the entire of the day.

  • abbadon420@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve seen websites of local stores in the bible belt that weren’t reachable on sundays, but a government site not working at certain times is just weird and backwards.

  • squirrel_bear@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    In Finland you can access your info and do online forms any time of the day. The information gets updated when it gets and the site has the newest version available at the time. When they do maintenance, they inform it couple of days before on the website.

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    … its a website run by the US Government. Why does it have such large downtimes in this day and age?

    In case you were unaware, the US government sucks at everything but killing people, and sometimes they take 20yr to do that. They just flat out suck, there’s your “why.”

  • MrMonkey@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The hours unavailable:

    Day Time Offline Start Stop
    Monday - Friday 4 hours 1am 5am
    Saturday 6 hours 11pm 5am
    Sunday 8½ hours 11:30pm 8am
    Total 34½ hours/week

    The first one sounds like “scheduled maintenance” gone awry. Like for something that takes 5 minutes to run that you tell your boss will take an hour, who tells his boss it’ll take two hours, boss then says “let’s double that to be safe”.

    I wanna know WHY it is unavailable. Does the system crash if there’s not enough paper in the dot-matrix printer? Are the HTTP responses being filled out manually in real time?

    • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have the same for the tax system in Sweden. The reason there is multi part but two big ones are:

      Guarantees around how long time processing your tax information will take. But this gets harder if your information comes in at off hours since the tax information still needs a human stamp of approval (which really is making sure the system didn’t flag it as manual review which happens at random and if there are discrepancies)

      The second, related one, is that they do batch processing at night and while they could queue data for the next day doing so would require a rewrite of the law guaranteeing a certain processing time, since if your data comes in after the start of the batch run it won’t run until the next day, which would be hard to properly inform people about in a way they’ll accept. Better then to simply not accept it then.

      • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s like saying “This law ensures your application will be processed in 48hrs” then everyone rejoice and vote! But instead of adding more manpower to process they limit the application coming in. Sneaky.

        • ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I get your point I don’t really agree. This law/requirement on the tax agency predates digital tax forms and is the same if you send in on paper. It’s more about how they don’t want to make things more complicated by having different rules for different media. It’s still so much more simple to use the digital forms / system and very few people actually need these systems online during the night and even fewer companies. The benefit is simply far outweighed by the cost. Remember it would be tax payers that have to pay for the system being available 24/7 with everything that entails in increased support costs and infrastructure costs due to the higher SLA levels required from all parties involved.