• Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    3 months ago

    E-waste will continue to be a problem until companies are forced to make products that are designed to be repaired and upgraded without replacing them.

    We have certification for safety and compliance, why not one that guarantees that an electronic product can be fully repaired by the end user using readily available (and affordable!) parts? It can be on a scale from 1 to 10, and the less repairable the item, the more restricted its distribution should be.

    Every laptop should be made like a Framework laptop; every phone like a Fairphone. Every electronic product should certified to have long life.

    • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hardware is not even the biggest issue imho. Software/firmware is even much worse. How is it possible to sell a phone that does not even get updates for 5 years. And why is Fairphone, Google Pixel and iPhone standing out with only 5 ish years.

      Luckily the EU is currently working on that.

      • scorpionix@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        IMO its fine for vendors to abandon their products but they should be required to release all technical documentation and software used with the device into the public domain so enthusiasts can continue where companies stopped.

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Fair point re: software. Part of manufacturing products that don’t need to be thrown away would entail longer software support, naturally.

        But realistically, software was never an issue 15+ years ago, when your toaster and microwave weren’t connected to the internet and your fridge didn’t have a large tablet interface.

        I think we would all do better by having a few more “dumb, but immortal” products in our lives.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Exactly.

          Why can’t I buy a decent dumb TV? I get that people want smart TVs, but surely there’s a decent market for people who really don’t need those features and would be happier with a simpler product. I’m absolutely part of that market, and I’m sure there are others.

          I generally prefer simpler devices, and it was difficult buying a fridge with decent longevity (i.e. limited smart crap, ice maker in the freezer instead of fridge, etc). That’s becoming more and more difficult, and large appliances have shorter and shorter lifespans (I had my compressor die twice in <10 years in my LG fridge… fridges used to last 15+ years).

          • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I generally prefer simpler devices, and it was difficult buying a fridge with decent longevity (i.e. limited smart crap, ice maker in the freezer instead of fridge, etc). That’s becoming more and more difficult, and large appliances have shorter and shorter lifespans (I had my compressor die twice in <10 years in my LG fridge… fridges used to last 15+ years).

            I should say that my current fridge is 27 years old and has NEVER had a problem (other than over-stuffed crisper drawers being broken).

            I was reading that the average life for a fridge is 10-15 years, and I can’t honestly believe they are being made so poorly these days. They are such simple appliances, and I dread the day when I have to replace this one for a modern version.

            But I’d love for my next TV to be a dumb TV. All the features my LG tv has just gets in the way of using it. LOL

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Yeah, after some research, LG in general is the worst, especially with their linear compressor. It failed after 2-3 years (under warranty), and failed again after 4-5 more years. We didn’t bother fixing it again, since the repair people said it’d cost $600+ assuming the part is under warranty, and probably wouldn’t last much longer anyway. Samsung is apparently similarly bad, but with different components. I liked this video, which goes over which fridge to get, and other resources say something similar: LG and Samsung are piles of crap (they’re super fancy though), Whirlpool and GE are better if you avoid fancy features, and everything kind of sucks.

              We went with Whirlpool this time, but everything I’ve read says the expected lifetime is still just 10-years. I don’t want fancy features, I just want it to keep things cold, and I’d rather pay someone to fix it than replace it…

              All the features my LG tv has just gets in the way of using it

              Same. I have a Samsung “dumb” TV (~40", 1080p) from ~10 years ago and it’s fine, and I have an LG “smart” TV (~55", 4k) from 5-ish years ago, which can be a pain to use and I’d prefer to just have a “dumb” TV instead. I even use the “smart” features sometimes, but they’re slow and I’d get a much better experience with a small PC hooked up to it instead.

              But it’s incredibly hard to find non-smart TVs. There’s a handful of “hospitality” TVs, but they’re usually lower resolution, don’t have nice features like OLED, and size seems to cap out around 40" at the biggest (most are 32"). I don’t want any of the AI fixing crap, apps, etc, just give me a bunch of HDMI ports (ideally DisplayPort as well) and a decent picture.

              • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I remember watching a recent program (one of those investigative consumer news shows), and I remember the LG problem you mentioned. A ton of people had an issue with that compressor, and LG just kept selling the damn things. Knock on wood, our LG washer and drier, and TV have been very reliable.

                I’d get a much better experience with a small PC hooked up to it instead

                That’s what I do these days. Combined with media I have on my NAS, I don’t need other “apps” or garbage nonsense on my TV. If only they made 60" computer monitors. LOL

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  LG just kept selling the damn things. Knock on wood, our LG washer and drier, and TV have been very reliable.

                  Apparently it’s just their refrigerators that suck, just like with Samsung.

                  We have an LG washing machine and dryer, and other than one repair that I handled myself (logic board failure, so $150-200 repair), it has been solid. I also have an LG TV, and aside from the smart crap, it works pretty well (have had for >7 years now).

                  Combined with media I have on my NAS

                  The one feature I like about the smart TV is support for DLNA, which means I can stream video directly to it from my NAS. I have ripped many of our DVDs to the NAS so I don’t need to go fiddle with disks to watch something. My Blu-ray player supports DLNA as well, so I don’t really need the TV to support it, but it is somewhat convenient.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, seriously. Phones work fine hardware-wise for much longer than they get software updates for. If a company has to choose between supporting their existing model or making a new phone in terms of workload, they should support their existing model until at least most of the people who bought the phone when it was new now have physically broken phones.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The new Pixel is 7 years, which really should be the norm.

        I’d really rather use a Linux phone, but a mix of closed modems and other non-technical issues are causing headaches. But theoretically, support on those devices could be indefinite because I could patch it myself if needed.

        • toastal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          I just want a simple headphone jack that has worked for like the last century instead of relying on flaky Bluetooth that becomes a physical fingerprint, but apparently that’s too much to ask for in phones now

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            It would also be nice to have a microsd slot like my crappy flip phone had almost 20 years ago, instead of paying out the nose for non-upgradeable storage.

            • toastal@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              My phone has both, but there is literally only one flagship left on the market with the specs

        • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I worry that it’ll just become a million distros with incompatible apps and dumb shit like that. Bad enough we have to have 5 or 6 guides for each piece of software on Linux.

          Im.glad apt, yum and systemd exist.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I think we’ll largely just piggy back off Android, kind of like WINE/Proton does for Windows stuff. There will probably be a few flavors of that, but it’ll all essentially be the same thing.

            But who knows, I’d like that to be the problem we have instead of current problem where basic functionality doesn’t work reliabiably (like waking to receive a call/text).

      • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I had an iPad I won from work and Apple successfully turned it into a paperweight. I had to do these convoluted things just to get apps installed, because the app store refused to install them on an old device. Apple and it’s walled garden are very much to blame, Steve Jobs perfected modern day planned obsolescence and the company does everything it can to ensure even small failures require a device replacement.

  • TheMurphy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    3 months ago

    And that is exactly why we need more regulation on this area, because it’s NOT sustainable right now.

    This was why the EU made it mandatory to use USB-C, so we only need few chargers for everything in our home. This alone were tons of e-waste reduced each year.

    We need this thinking in other areas too.

  • auth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 months ago

    We need phones that don’t break so easily and we should be able to repair them and replace the battery, at the very least.

    • sibachian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      we have phones that don’t break easily and we can repair them and replace the battery; with long-term support.

      what we need are laws that makes it mandatory for all.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Make laws that give consumers mandatory, irrevocable warranties that include fit-for-purpose clauses, and has phrasing such as “reasonable expected lifetime” for the goods. Make those laws apply to whoever sells you the goods, not the manufacturer.

        Laws like that weed out a lot of crap. Shops won’t buy crap in because they have to deal with the warranty on said crap. Manufacturers won’t make (as much) crap because they have to deal with returns.

        You won’t be able to buy a $4 air fryer any more, but the one you do buy will last a lot longer.

        Edit: I’m Australian, and we have consumer rights over and above warranties offered by manufacturers. Those rights would be a good start.

        They start about half way down this page:

        https://www.accc.gov.au/consumers/buying-products-and-services/consumer-rights-and-guarantees

        • sibachian@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          an online store could operate from places where such laws don’t apply. most people nowadays mainly do their shopping online anyway and physical stores have largely disappeared unless it doubles as a warehouse. i guess australia and NZ has the advantage of stringent import laws though.

          but i suppose this goes for my earlier argument as well.

          • arrowMace@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            According to the page linked in the post above, overseas businesses selling in Australia are subject to the same rules. It does say the rules might be hard to enforce on overseas businesses though.

    • Chahk@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I remember a while ago Motorola (before Google acquisition) came out with a phone that had a nearly indestructible screen. in the video they were throwing it off a roof, hitting it with a hammer, crushing it with a car, and all it had was a couple of dings. Haven’t heard a peep since then. What happened to that technology?

      • auth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        What happened to that technology?

        They probably realized that profits would decrease.

      • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The insatiable need for thinner and lighter phones means that every new version of gorilla glass allows them to make it thinner. A 1mm piece of gorilla glass holds up way better than the thin shit they use.

    • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was really excited to see that OnePlus has official parts distributors that sell oem parts. I got a new battery, USB port, seal, screen protector and battery pull tab for $90. Just a pity it costs $300 for a new screen.

      • auth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        yeah, the screen on my Pixel 7A cost more than $200 to get replaced and I can find a brand new 7A for $250… not worth the risk of a bad repair

  • Gabu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The most fucked up part is that, if I could, I’d happily take in some of that trash to repair and recirculate it, but corporations make that as difficult as possible so as to not hurt their profits.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      And I’d happily keep my current phone if it had security updates, but those ended a few months ago so I’ll be throwing out a perfectly good device.

      I’m getting a Pixel for my next phone so I can get 7 years of updates, so I’m trying, but it just sucks that perfectly good hardware gets thrown out just because the manufacturer either blocks repairs or stops supporting it…

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Anecdotal but in my career in corporate this has been the order of operations

      1. Employees get any old equipment free if asked
      2. Employees can pay for any old equipment if asked at a reduced cost
      3. Employees can’t get any old equipment

      The reason was they company wasn’t getting any benefit to give away the equipment. Then it was too much of a hassle to write paperwork for the sales which are then used to write down refreshes. Then they just blanket sold to another company which as an employee you then have to engage but with no discounts.

      These big businesses make money hands over feet but god forbid they let Joe Employee keep his old laptop for his kid as an unofficial perk of working there.

    • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Parts are expensive and profit margins are thin. What’s stopping us from buying parts on eBay and reselling those phones for profit? You pretty much end up with the cost of the phone to repair the phone.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 months ago

    E waste is full of precious metals. You’d think someone would figure out how to recover them.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      There are trace amounts of precious metals mixed in with a lot of other crap. It’s possible to recover them, but nobody is going to do that if recovery costs more than the metals are worth.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      'Tis the nature of Economics. -If recycling for money were easy and profitable then it’s highly likely that someone would already be doing it really well and competition would be jumping in to reap some of the rewards. -That said, you will always need a ‘Pioneer’ to pave the way.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      People are doing this, but it requires some gnarly acids and a lot of material. Think extracting gold from sticks of RAM with aqua regia. Not sure of the exact process but scrappers do this in some capacity. I’d imagine the waste from these processes is particularly nasty.

    • Sizzler@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Less and less, the last good stuff was made well before the millennium. It costs to put it in there, so manufacturing processes have become more plastic, less metal. Same goes for cars and white goods.

  • robsuto@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I feel a law that would go a long way would be to force companies to release code, drivers, and designs of any product they no longer support. That includes Intellectual Property. If you no longer support a product, then you don’t need the IP used on it.

    We either get everything we need to use EOL products however we want, or companies support products much longer to protect their IP.

    • KyuubiNoKitsune@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      While capitalism is a disease, publicly traded companies are the festering wounds. When the product becomes investor sentiment, the only thing that matters is making more profits at any cost

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    Don’t look into that recycling either. It’s just arbitrage all the way to the acid vat man.

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    The laws don’t go far enough to protect usability of both the hardware and software. For example, the new EU law about software, only requires smart TVs to have software updates for only 5 years (my own $2k Sony TV only gave me software updates for its AndroidTV for only 2 years! – these days I don’t connect it to the internet at all due to security problems). Who throws a TV every 5 years? IMO, it should ask for 6 years for full updated phones, plus 3 additional years for security updates, computers should go to 12 years, and TVs to 15 years.

    Personally, I’ve been gathering old laptops and towers from friends and family and “upgrade” them with Debian and XFce. As long as they have more than 450 Passmark CPU points, and 2+ GB of RAM, these machines can still serve a purpose. So far, I’ve repurposed 12 such machines and gave them away back to their owner, my mom, my nieces, and two of my cousins. Even on machines with only 2 GB of RAM, it’s enough to run a browser with up to 3 tabs before touching the swap file (Debian/XFce clean-boots to about 800 MBs of RAM). That works just fine for someone like my mom who doesn’t even how to open a new tab, or for a young kid researching for school.

    I would do the same with old phones too, but most of the models bought here in Greece are cheap Chinese Xiaomi/Huawei/realme phones, so LineageOS doesn’t support them. That’s the biggest travesty these days, since very few people buy computers now. Think if Google could ask as part of android license that all phones have usb-out for monitors, and all these phones can then be transformed like Samsung’s desktop DEX OS. I mean, most phones today have 4+ GB of RAM and 128 GB internal memory, just like an old laptop would. It should be able to transform itself into a desktop OS on demand and extend its life and its purpose.

    • ordellrb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      I had this exact idea but for old Consoles: every PS4 could be a perfectly capable x86 Computer, 8GB of Ram and a AMD CPU, enough Power for Office and Web for a long Time. Only Problem the Software.

      • AJ Sadauskas@aus.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        @ordellrb @eugenia The other place the motherboards of old phones could be repurposed is in embedded processors.

        Most home appliances feature embedded processors and motherboards these days. Many commercial and industrial buildings and structures feature a range of embedded sensors.

        In many cases, a repurposed three-year-old or even six-year-old iPhone or Samsung Galaxy motherboard is overkill in terms of being capable for these kinds of applications.

        Especially if they’re reflashed with an embedded device-focussed operating system, such as QNX.

        Instead of making new motherboards for embedded devices, why not repurpose old consumer tech instead?

  • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Wireless earbuds are trash and part of the problem, like wireless mouses. Stop putting irremovable batteries in things that don’t need batteries, its basically just planned obselecence on shinier more expensive goods. The last thing I want is to spend money on is good quality audio equipment that has a necessary end of life date due to charge cycles. These days you can scarcely find good headphones that arent wireless.

      • auth@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        thanks. someone need to make a bot that auto-post archive links for paywalled sites though

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I the mean time, mods should just make a rule that says archive links need to be added to the post body if there is a paywall.

          And that said, I don’t get the Wired paywall at all and I’m not subscribed. I wonder if it’s an AB test.

          • auth@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            And that said, I don’t get the Wired paywall at all and I’m not subscribed. I wonder if it’s an AB test.

            I dont get it either besides that obnoxious banner that you can minimize… might be because of ublock origin addon

  • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I feel like the answer is recycling deposits somehow. I’ve seen attempts at them here and there, but I guess we haven’t quite figured out the details yet. I guess electronics are a bit trickier to set up a deposit system for than pop cans. Even the places that do have electronics deposits, often you have to drive to a special recycling centre out past the airport that’s open 3 hours in the middle of the day, only for them to tell you that everything’s glued together so they can’t really separate out the parts they need and most of it will probably end up just going to the landfill anyway.

    But theoretically, if we could get a serious deposit system that allowed for recycling to be profitable and gave manufacturers and incentive for making their stuff easier to take apart and recycling (and hence easier to repair), that would be pretty sweet.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      A lot of the stuff you recycle doesn’t actually get recycled, at least in the US. I just got a new fridge and they carried old one away for me, but I’m pretty sure they just take it to the dump and the thing that’s recycled is the refrigerant.

      I’m a huge fan of recycling, but I don’t think we actually process most of the recycling we have, so we should be focusing more on things lasting longer. Phones have kind of plateaued, so they should have longer support cycles, better repairability, and smoother resale.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ironically the same stuck up bitches who are always virtue-posting about how green they are, (make damn sure the waiter knows they don’t want a straw in their drink, etc.) are the same people who insist on yearly Apple flagship refreshes so they get social affirmation.